Nord Stream II blow out... Not really a mistery.

 Dear readers, i guess it wouldn’t take long until something like this happened again.

A terrorist attack.

The explosion of the Nord Stream II pipeline was no accident. It was deliberate. And an act like this can be called many things, but one of them is: terrorism.

In times of war, this is one known strategy to happen. It has been happening for many years now, right in front of our eyes. The thing is that the media makes it looks like there is nothing we can do about it, but this is not correct.

We can avoid such things to continue to happen if we find the source of the terrorism.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is not an easy task. But we have a good idea where to begin.

Its clear that the architects of this Nord Stream II pipeline explosion were the western bankers.

Why you ask me? Explanation follows.

Going back after the second world war, western bankers took control over European nations central banks. In Europe as well as in the United States, this control was very well established.

They did the same with Russia. After the war, the Czars regime was taken down and western bankers took control of Russian central bank, putting them on a leash.

But there, the situation was never as stable as in the rest of the world. The old power (descendants of the Czars) wouldn’t be quiet and just settle. They wanted their power back.

Cold war, was all about the settling of this power (in short).

Now what we see, is the old power in Russia, trying to break free from western bankers hegemony and control.

Until the beginning of the year what we observed was “only” an economic warfare.  But then I took the form of actual acts of war such as the invasion of Ukraine. Not mentioning the war in Syria, but this is for another article.

Now the most recent act of war was the explosion of the Nord Stream II pipeline.

But everyone is asking who did it. The western media is pointing to Russia, obviously.

Who finances the western media outlets? The western bankers.

If anyone tends to believe in that, is solely because we try to deny the facts that are too hard to accept. It’s a human condition to try to believe in something that is more convenient. No one likes to think that in the end, our governments (allied to the western bankers) are the villains in the story.

Not saying that Russia is the good side. Because there are NO good sides on this situation. Both sides are in for the same reason: money.

Nord Stream II is an strategic and very valuable asset to Russia. With it, they had plans to supply gas to Europe for the next, many,  years. So the question is: Why would they blow up their own pipe line? The answer: They wouldn’t.

It was obviously an act of the opponents. Who would profit from the destruction of the pipeline? The western bankers.

They want to defeat Russia and jeopardize them economically, in an attempt to push them back and try to re-establish the status quo achieved after the cold war… If any.

The fact is, if everyone played the ball and agreed on oil exportation profits (2014) this would never had happened. The problem is that the bankers had a disagreement related to who would supply the oil to the world and since then we face the consequences.

Russia old rulers don’t want to give up that easy on the power (and money) and the western bankers just wont stop pushing and forcing their demise. That’s because is an eat or get eaten world. They know if they let the Russians loose, its just a matter of time until they come knocking on their doors too.

But again, no one is good, no one is right, no one is the hero in this story. There are only villains, only people trying to do bad things… In the name of money.

The heroes that could actually save the world from this demise is: ourselves.

We as “the people” have actually most of the power in our hands to fight back. But for this to succeed, we need to work together. I’m not saying to go on the streets on a rampage against the bankers, but to try to confront them politically. In a civilized way.

How could this be done?

My approach would be simple, but not easy: Cut the ties between the banks and the governments.